V archivech slavn\u00e9ho spisovatele Anthonyho Burgesse byl u\u010din\u011bn pr\u016flomov\u00fd objev. Profesor literatury Andrew Biswell vykopal 200str\u00e1nkov\u00fd rukopis s n\u00e1zvem “Stav natahovac\u00edho strojku”, d\u0159\u00edve nezn\u00e1m\u00e9 d\u00edlo, kter\u00e9 se zab\u00fdv\u00e1 filozofick\u00fdmi t\u00e9maty Burgesseova nejslavn\u011bj\u0161\u00edho rom\u00e1nu “Mechanick\u00fd pomeran\u010d”.<\/p>\n\n
Na rozd\u00edl od pov\u011bst\u00ed “Stav natahovac\u00edho strojku” nen\u00ed p\u0159\u00edm\u00fdm pokra\u010dov\u00e1n\u00edm “Mechanick\u00e9ho pomeran\u010de”. M\u00edsto toho se jedn\u00e1 o filozofickou \u00favahu o “stavu modern\u00edho \u010dlov\u011bka”, strukturovanou podobn\u011b jako Danteho “Peklo”. Burgess zam\u00fd\u0161lel toto d\u00edlo vyu\u017e\u00edt k prozkoum\u00e1n\u00ed slo\u017eit\u00fdch ot\u00e1zek zlo\u010dinu, trestu a vizu\u00e1ln\u00ed kultury, kter\u00e9 byly \u00fast\u0159edn\u00ed v jeho p\u0159edchoz\u00edm rom\u00e1nu.<\/p>\n\n
Vznik “Stavu natahovac\u00edho strojku” se datuje k \u017e\u00e1dosti vydavatele, kter\u00fd se cht\u011bl p\u0159i\u017eivit na \u00fasp\u011bchu filmov\u00e9 adaptace “Mechanick\u00e9ho pomeran\u010de” Stanleyho Kubricka z roku 1971. Burgess souhlasil, \u017ee nap\u00ed\u0161e kr\u00e1tk\u00e9 pokra\u010dov\u00e1n\u00ed s v\u00fdrazem “natahovac\u00ed strojek” v n\u00e1zvu. Ale jak se do projektu pono\u0159oval, rukopis daleko p\u0159erostl sv\u016fj p\u016fvodn\u00ed z\u00e1m\u011br.<\/p>\n\n
“Stav natahovac\u00edho strojku” poskytuje cenn\u00e9 autobiografick\u00e9 post\u0159ehy o Burgessov\u011b \u017eivot\u011b a d\u00edle. Odhaluje p\u016fvod ikonick\u00e9ho n\u00e1zvu “Mechanick\u00fd pomeran\u010d”, kter\u00fd Burgess zaslechl od star\u0161\u00edho mu\u017ee z Cockney b\u011bhem sv\u00e9 vojensk\u00e9 slu\u017eby. Rukopis rovn\u011b\u017e vrh\u00e1 sv\u011btlo na Burgesseovy rozporupln\u00e9 pocity ohledn\u011b kontroverze kolem “Mechanick\u00e9ho pomeran\u010de” a jeho \u00fadajn\u00e9ho vlivu na n\u00e1siln\u00e9 zlo\u010diny.<\/p>\n\n
Navzdory sv\u00e9mu po\u010d\u00e1te\u010dn\u00edmu nad\u0161en\u00ed Burgess nakonec pr\u00e1ci na “Stavu natahovac\u00edho strojku” vzdal. Uv\u011bdomil si, \u017ee jeho siln\u00e9 str\u00e1nky spo\u010d\u00edvaj\u00ed sp\u00ed\u0161e ve fikci ne\u017e ve filozofii. Pozd\u011bji v\u0161ak vydal kr\u00e1tkou novelu s n\u00e1zvem “Z\u00e1v\u011b\u0165 natahovac\u00edho strojku”, kter\u00e1 zkoumala n\u011bkter\u00e1 t\u00e9mata, kter\u00e1 nast\u00ednil ve “Stavu natahovac\u00edho strojku”.<\/p>\n\n
P\u0159esto\u017ee nebyly ozn\u00e1meny \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 pl\u00e1ny na vyd\u00e1n\u00ed \u00fapln\u00e9 verze “Stavu natahovac\u00edho strojku”, Biswell v\u011b\u0159\u00ed, \u017ee existuje dostatek materi\u00e1lu v dokon\u010den\u00e9m stavu, aby z n\u011bj byl \u017eivotaschopn\u00fd projekt. Objev tohoto rukopisu vedl tak\u00e9 k odhalen\u00ed dal\u0161\u00edch nevydan\u00fdch d\u011bl Burgesse, v\u010detn\u011b nedokon\u010den\u00e9ho slovn\u00edku slangu.<\/p>\n\n
Objev “Stavu natahovac\u00edho strojku” je d\u016fkazem trval\u00e9ho odkazu Anthonyho Burgesse a s\u00edly literatury zkoumat lidskou podm\u00ednku v cel\u00e9 jej\u00ed slo\u017eitosti. Poskytuje fascinuj\u00edc\u00ed pohled do tv\u016fr\u010d\u00edho procesu mistrovsk\u00e9ho spisovatele a nab\u00edz\u00ed nov\u00e9 poznatky o t\u00e9matech, kter\u00e1 formovala jeho nejslavn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed d\u00edla.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Ztracen\u00fd rukopis Anthonyho Burgesse: “Stav natahovac\u00edho strojku” Objev liter\u00e1rn\u00edho pokladu V archivech slavn\u00e9ho spisovatele Anthonyho Burgesse byl u\u010din\u011bn pr\u016flomov\u00fd objev. Profesor literatury Andrew Biswell vykopal 200str\u00e1nkov\u00fd rukopis s n\u00e1zvem “Stav…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":23824,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[19451,98,19452,19454,1515,19453],"class_list":["post-14492","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-anthony-burgess","tag-philosophy","tag-clockwork-orange","tag-punishment","tag-crime","tag-lost-manuscripts"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14492","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14492"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14492\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14493,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14492\/revisions\/14493"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/23824"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14492"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14492"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14492"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}