Sv\u011bt v\u00fdtvarn\u00e9ho um\u011bn\u00ed byl sv\u011bdkem rekordn\u00edho prodeje, kdy\u017e se tento t\u00fdden obraz od Gauguina prodal za t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 300 milion\u016f dolar\u016f a p\u0159ekonal tak p\u0159edchoz\u00ed rekord o 25 %. Tato akvizice zd\u016fraz\u0148uje rostouc\u00ed ceny a intenzivn\u00ed konkurenci na trhu se sb\u011bratelsk\u00fdmi um\u011bleck\u00fdmi d\u00edly.<\/p>\n\n
Zm\u00edn\u011bn\u00fdm um\u011bleck\u00fdm d\u00edlem je Gauguin\u016fv obraz \u201eNafea Faa Ipoipo\u201c (Za koho se vd\u00e1\u0161?), portr\u00e9t se slo\u017eitou histori\u00ed. Kdysi byl sou\u010d\u00e1st\u00ed proslul\u00e9 sb\u00edrky Rudolfa Staechelina, b\u00fdval\u00e9ho v\u00fdkonn\u00e9ho \u0159editele spole\u010dnosti Sotheby’s. Staechelin tento obraz \u0161t\u011bd\u0159e zap\u016fj\u010dil muzeu Kunstmuseum Basel na t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 p\u011bt desetilet\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n
Spor mezi Staechel\u00ednem a veden\u00edm muzea ohledn\u011b podm\u00ednek z\u00e1p\u016fj\u010dky ho v\u0161ak p\u0159im\u011bl, aby celou sb\u00edrku st\u00e1hl.<\/p>\n\n
Identita kupuj\u00edc\u00edho, kter\u00fd za Gauguin\u016fv obraz zaplatil astronomickou cenu, z\u016fst\u00e1v\u00e1 nepotvrzen\u00e1. \u0158\u00edk\u00e1 se, \u017ee jde o muzeum v Kataru, kter\u00e9 je zn\u00e1m\u00e9 agresivn\u00edm skupov\u00e1n\u00edm drah\u00fdch um\u011bleck\u00fdch d\u011bl. Ani prod\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00ed, ani muzeum ofici\u00e1ln\u011b neozn\u00e1mili, kam obraz sm\u011b\u0159uje.<\/p>\n\n
Prodej obrazu \u201eNafea Faa Ipoipo\u201c zanechal v Basileji mezeru, kde byl vystaven\u00fd p\u016fl stolet\u00ed. Obyvatel\u00e9 m\u011bsta jsou ztr\u00e1tou takov\u00e9ho cen\u011bn\u00e9ho kusu hluboce zarmouceni. Incident slou\u017e\u00ed jako drsn\u00e1 p\u0159ipom\u00ednka, \u017ee i trval\u00e9 z\u00e1p\u016fj\u010dky jsou nakonec do\u010dasn\u00e9.<\/p>\n\n
Prodej Gauguinova mistrovsk\u00e9ho d\u00edla odr\u00e1\u017e\u00ed prudce rostouc\u00ed ceny na trhu s um\u011bn\u00edm. Sb\u011bratel\u00e9 dycht\u00ed po tom, aby z\u00edskali cen\u011bn\u00e1 d\u00edla, a posouvaj\u00ed hranice toho, co je pova\u017eov\u00e1no za finan\u010dn\u011b provediteln\u00e9.<\/p>\n\n
S t\u00edm, jak trh s um\u011bn\u00edm vzkv\u00e9t\u00e1, muzea \u010del\u00ed nov\u00fdm v\u00fdzv\u00e1m. Rozmach selfie ty\u010d\u00ed vyvolal obavy o zachov\u00e1n\u00ed nedoceniteln\u00fdch sb\u00edrek. Mnoho muze\u00ed zavedlo z\u00e1kazy, aby ochr\u00e1nila sv\u00e9 artefakty p\u0159ed mo\u017en\u00fdm po\u0161kozen\u00edm.<\/p>\n\n
Gauguin\u016fv obraz \u201eNafea Faa Ipoipo\u201c je sv\u011bdectv\u00edm o trval\u00e9 s\u00edle impresionismu a postimpresionismu. Tato um\u011bleck\u00e1 hnut\u00ed zp\u016fsobila revoluci ve zp\u016fsobu, jak\u00fdm um\u011blci ztv\u00e1r\u0148ovali sv\u011btlo a barvy, a zanechala trval\u00fd odkaz ve sv\u011bt\u011b um\u011bn\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n
Soukrom\u00e9 sb\u00edrky hraj\u00ed z\u00e1sadn\u00ed roli v zachov\u00e1n\u00ed a ocen\u011bn\u00ed um\u011bn\u00ed. \u010casto v nich s\u00eddl\u00ed mistrovsk\u00e1 d\u00edla, kter\u00e1 by jinak z\u016fstala ve\u0159ejnosti nep\u0159\u00edstupn\u00e1. Prodej obrazu \u201eNafea Faa Ipoipo\u201c v\u0161ak zd\u016fraz\u0148uje pom\u00edjivou povahu soukrom\u00fdch sb\u00edrek.<\/p>\n\n
Prodej Gauguinova obrazu \u201eNafea Faa Ipoipo\u201c je p\u0159elomov\u00fdm okam\u017eikem ve sv\u011bt\u011b um\u011bn\u00ed. Zd\u016fraz\u0148uje neutuchaj\u00edc\u00ed popt\u00e1vku po mistrovsk\u00fdch d\u00edlech, v\u00fdzvy, kter\u00fdm muzea \u010del\u00ed, a trval\u00fd odkaz vlivn\u00fdch um\u011bleck\u00fdch hnut\u00ed.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Nejdra\u017e\u0161\u00ed obraz, kter\u00fd byl kdy prod\u00e1n: Gauguin\u016fv obraz \u201eNafea Faa Ipoipo\u201c Pozad\u00ed Sv\u011bt v\u00fdtvarn\u00e9ho um\u011bn\u00ed byl sv\u011bdkem rekordn\u00edho prodeje, kdy\u017e se tento t\u00fdden obraz od Gauguina prodal za t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 300…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[710],"tags":[104,2253,1337,19760,2254,19763,19762,19761,8629,7922],"class_list":["post-14746","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-art-history","tag-art-history","tag-impressionism","tag-museum-collections","tag-gauguin","tag-post-impressionism","tag-selfie-sticks","tag-private-collections","tag-art-market","tag-art-preservation","tag-fine-art"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14746","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14746"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14746\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14747,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14746\/revisions\/14747"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14746"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14746"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14746"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}