V pr\u016flomov\u00e9m soudn\u00edm sporu dos\u00e1hla poz\u016fstalost zesnul\u00e9ho komika George Carlina dohody se dv\u011bma moder\u00e1tory podcastu, kte\u0159\u00ed pou\u017eili um\u011blou inteligenci (AI) k vytvo\u0159en\u00ed fale\u0161n\u00e9 stand-upov\u00e9 rutiny v Carlinsov\u011b hlase.<\/p>\n\n
Moder\u00e1to\u0159i podcastu, Chad Kultgen a Will Sasso, zve\u0159ejnili hodinovou komedi\u00e1ln\u00ed speci\u00e1l s n\u00e1zvem \u201eGeorge Carlin: Jsem r\u00e1d, \u017ee jsem mrtv\u00fd\u201c ve sv\u00e9m podcastu \u201eDudesy\u201c. Speci\u00e1l obsahoval AI generovan\u00fd hlas, kter\u00fd napodoboval Carlin\u016fv v\u00fdrazn\u00fd rytmus a p\u0159ednes a vypr\u00e1v\u011bl vtipy na sou\u010dasn\u00e1 t\u00e9mata, jako jsou reality show, zru\u0161en\u00ed financov\u00e1n\u00ed policie a samotn\u00e1 AI.<\/p>\n\n
Carlinsova poz\u016fstalost podala \u017ealobu a tvrdila poru\u0161en\u00ed autorsk\u00fdch pr\u00e1v a pomluvu. Tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee AI generovan\u00e1 rutina poru\u0161uje Carlinova pr\u00e1va du\u0161evn\u00edho vlastnictv\u00ed a zkresluje jeho n\u00e1zory.<\/p>\n\n
Podle dohody o vyrovn\u00e1n\u00ed souhlasili Kultgen a Sasso s t\u00edm, \u017ee odstran\u00ed speci\u00e1l ze v\u0161ech platforem a nebudou v budoucnu pou\u017e\u00edvat Carlinovu \u201epodobu, hlas nebo podobnost\u201c bez souhlasu poz\u016fstalosti. Vyrovn\u00e1n\u00ed tak\u00e9 zahrnovalo finan\u010dn\u00ed n\u00e1hradu, i kdy\u017e \u010d\u00e1stka nebyla zve\u0159ejn\u011bna.<\/p>\n\n
P\u0159\u00edpad vyvolal \u0161ir\u0161\u00ed debatu o etick\u00fdch a pr\u00e1vn\u00edch d\u016fsledc\u00edch obsahu generovan\u00e9ho AI. Kritici tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee AI modely tr\u00e9novan\u00e9 na materi\u00e1lech chr\u00e1n\u011bn\u00fdch autorsk\u00fdm pr\u00e1vem mohou poru\u0161ovat pr\u00e1va um\u011blc\u016f a sni\u017eovat hodnotu origin\u00e1ln\u00edch d\u011bl.<\/p>\n\n
V reakci na rostouc\u00ed obavy skupina z\u00e1konod\u00e1rc\u016f v Kongresu p\u0159edlo\u017eila n\u00e1vrh z\u00e1kona, kter\u00fd by zavedl feder\u00e1ln\u00ed ochranu proti pad\u011blk\u016fm a napodobenin\u00e1m generovan\u00fdm AI. Navrhovan\u00fd z\u00e1kon m\u00e1 za c\u00edl chr\u00e1nit pr\u00e1vo jednotlivc\u016f na jejich vlastn\u00ed obraz a hlas.<\/p>\n\n
Josh Schiller, pr\u00e1vn\u00edk zastupuj\u00edc\u00ed Carlinsovu poz\u016fstalost, p\u0159iv\u00edtal urovn\u00e1n\u00ed jako \u201eprecedens\u201c pro \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed podobn\u00fdch spor\u016f v budoucnu. Zd\u016fraznil pot\u0159ebu rychl\u00e9 a rozhodn\u00e9 akce proti zneu\u017eit\u00ed technologie AI jako zbran\u011b.<\/p>\n\n
Carlinova dcera, Kelly Carlinov\u00e1, vyj\u00e1d\u0159ila vd\u011b\u010dnost za rychl\u00e9 vy\u0159e\u0161en\u00ed p\u0159\u00edpadu. Zd\u016fraznila v\u0161ak d\u016fle\u017eitost \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed nebezpe\u010d\u00ed, kter\u00e1 p\u0159edstavuj\u00ed technologie AI. Vyzvala k p\u0159ijet\u00ed vhodn\u00fdch ochrann\u00fdch opat\u0159en\u00ed na ochranu nejen um\u011blc\u016f, ale v\u0161ech jednotlivc\u016f.<\/p>\n\n
P\u0159\u00edpad Carlin nen\u00ed ojedin\u011bl\u00fdm p\u0159\u00edpadem. Skupina v\u00fdznamn\u00fdch spisovatel\u016f tak\u00e9 podala \u017ealobu proti spole\u010dnosti OpenAI, spole\u010dnosti stoj\u00edc\u00ed za chatbotem ChatGPT, za pou\u017eit\u00ed jejich d\u011bl k v\u00fdcviku modelu bez povolen\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n
Debata o obsahu generovan\u00e9m AI st\u00e1le prob\u00edh\u00e1, bez jasn\u00e9ho konsensu o tom, jak vyv\u00e1\u017eit inovace s ochranou pr\u00e1v du\u0161evn\u00edho vlastnictv\u00ed. Pr\u00e1vn\u00ed a etick\u00e9 r\u00e1mce se st\u00e1le vyv\u00edjej\u00ed a kone\u010dn\u00fd dopad AI na um\u011bleck\u00e9 svobody z\u016fst\u00e1v\u00e1 nejist\u00fd.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Vy\u0159e\u0161ena \u017ealoba poz\u016fstalosti George Carlin ohledn\u011b AI imitace, vyvst\u00e1vaj\u00ed obavy V pr\u016flomov\u00e9m soudn\u00edm sporu dos\u00e1hla poz\u016fstalost zesnul\u00e9ho komika George Carlina dohody se dv\u011bma moder\u00e1tory podcastu, kte\u0159\u00ed pou\u017eili um\u011blou inteligenci (AI)…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":23622,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[172],"tags":[4623,1280,22761,1254,19039],"class_list":["post-17282","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-digital-art","tag-intellectual-property","tag-ethics","tag-george-carlin","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-copyright-law"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17282","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17282"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17282\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17283,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17282\/revisions\/17283"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/23622"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17282"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17282"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17282"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}