Po cel\u00e1 desetilet\u00ed historici um\u011bn\u00ed vedli debaty o pravosti mnoha obraz\u016f p\u0159ipisovan\u00fdch Vincentu van Goghovi. Koncem 90. let a po\u010d\u00e1tkem 2000. let pochybnosti zes\u00edlily a n\u011bkte\u0159\u00ed odborn\u00edci nazna\u010dili, \u017ee a\u017e 45 van Goghov\u00fdch d\u011bl ve v\u00fdznamn\u00fdch muze\u00edch by mohly b\u00fdt pad\u011blky. Ned\u00e1vn\u00e9 pokroky v autentiza\u010dn\u00edch technik\u00e1ch v\u0161ak vedly ke zm\u011bn\u011b tohoto trendu.<\/p>\n\n
\u0160pi\u010dkov\u00e9 n\u00e1stroje, jako je technick\u00e1 anal\u00fdza a identifikace pigment\u016f, umo\u017enily v\u00fdzkumn\u00edk\u016fm znovu vyhodnotit d\u0159\u00edve zpochyb\u0148ovan\u00e1 d\u00edla. V d\u016fsledku toho bylo autentifikov\u00e1no n\u011bkolik obraz\u016f, kter\u00e9 byly kdysi pova\u017eov\u00e1ny za pad\u011blky, v\u010detn\u011b \u201eZ\u00e1padu slunce v Montmajour\u201c a \u201eV\u00e1zy s m\u00e1ky\u201c.<\/p>\n\n
V ned\u00e1vn\u00e9m v\u00fdvoji kontroverzn\u00ed sb\u011bratel um\u011bn\u00ed jm\u00e9nem Stuart Pivar odhalil krajinomalbu, o kter\u00e9 se domn\u00edv\u00e1, \u017ee by mohla b\u00fdt ztracen\u00fdm d\u00edlem Vincenta van Gogha. Obraz zachycuje pole p\u0161enice v Auvers ve Francii, kde um\u011blec str\u00e1vil sv\u00e9 posledn\u00ed m\u011bs\u00edce.<\/p>\n\n
Pivar je polarizuj\u00edc\u00ed postavou um\u011bleck\u00e9ho sv\u011bta, zn\u00e1mou svou spornou povahou a spojen\u00edm s odsouzen\u00fdm sexu\u00e1ln\u00edm delikventem Jeffreyem Epsteinem. P\u0159esto trv\u00e1 na tom, \u017ee obraz z\u00edskal leg\u00e1ln\u011b v aukci mimo Pa\u0159\u00ed\u017e.<\/p>\n\n
Michael Mezzatesta, emeritn\u00ed \u0159editel Duke University Museum of Art, obraz zkoumal a zaznamenal jeho nedot\u010den\u00fd stav a soulad s Van Goghov\u00fdmi pozdn\u011b kari\u00e9rn\u00edmi technikami. Pl\u00e1tno je z hrub\u00e9 pytloviny a podpis \u201eVincent\u201c se objevuje na zadn\u00ed stran\u011b spolu s t\u00edm, co se zd\u00e1 b\u00fdt datum \u201e1890\u201c vyti\u0161t\u011bn\u00e9 prchav\u00fdm o\u0159echov\u011b hn\u011bd\u00fdm inkoustem.<\/p>\n\n
Pivar oslovil amsterdamsk\u00e9 Van Goghovo muzeum s \u017e\u00e1dost\u00ed o ov\u011b\u0159en\u00ed pravosti. P\u0159esto\u017ee bylo muzeum z d\u016fvodu pandemie uzav\u0159eno, pro Pivarovu \u017e\u00e1dost ud\u011blalo v\u00fdjimku. Pokud bude obraz ov\u011b\u0159en, bude nejv\u011bt\u0161\u00edm v cel\u00e9 Van Goghov\u011b tvorb\u011b a jedin\u00fdm namalovan\u00fdm na \u010dtvercov\u00e9m pl\u00e1tn\u011b.<\/p>\n\n
\u0160t\u00edtek obrazu nazna\u010duje, \u017ee byl d\u0159\u00edve ve vlastnictv\u00ed Jonase Nettera, v\u00fdznamn\u00e9ho sb\u011bratele, kter\u00fd propagoval Amedea Modiglianiho a dal\u0161\u00ed um\u011blce z Montparnassu. P\u0159esn\u00e1 provenience obrazu v\u0161ak z\u016fst\u00e1v\u00e1 zahalena tajemstv\u00edm a Pivar slibuje anonymitu t\u011bm, kte\u0159\u00ed jej p\u016fvodn\u011b vlastnili.<\/p>\n\n
Ov\u011b\u0159en\u00ed pravosti obrazu zdaleka nen\u00ed jist\u00e9. Van Goghovo muzeum ka\u017edoro\u010dn\u011b obdr\u017e\u00ed \u010detn\u00e9 \u017e\u00e1dosti o ov\u011b\u0159en\u00ed pravosti a pouze mal\u00e9 procento z nich stoj\u00ed za dal\u0161\u00ed studium. Zda se \u201eAuvers, 1890\u201c stane jedn\u00edm z t\u011bch \u0161\u0165astn\u00fdch n\u011bkolika, se teprve uvid\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n
Pokud bude obraz ov\u011b\u0159en, bude objeven\u00ed t\u00e9to ztracen\u00e9 krajinomalby v\u00fdznamnou ud\u00e1lost\u00ed ve sv\u011bt\u011b um\u011bn\u00ed. Roz\u0161\u00ed\u0159ilo by to Van Goghovu zn\u00e1mou tvorbu a vrhlo by nov\u00e9 sv\u011btlo na jeho posledn\u00ed m\u011bs\u00edce. Kontroverze kolem Pivarova zapojen\u00ed a sporn\u00fdch po\u010d\u00e1tk\u016f obrazu v\u0161ak budou pravd\u011bpodobn\u011b d\u00e1le vyvol\u00e1vat debaty v n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00edch letech.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Vincent van Gogh: Byl objeven ztracen\u00fd obraz krajiny? Kontroverze ohledn\u011b pravosti Po cel\u00e1 desetilet\u00ed historici um\u011bn\u00ed vedli debaty o pravosti mnoha obraz\u016f p\u0159ipisovan\u00fdch Vincentu van Goghovi. Koncem 90. let a…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":24248,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2947],"tags":[104,2944,797,8717,102],"class_list":["post-4851","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-painting","tag-art-history","tag-landscape-painting","tag-authentication","tag-van-gogh-rediscovered","tag-lost-art"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4851","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4851"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4851\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24249,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4851\/revisions\/24249"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/24248"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4851"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4851"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4851"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}