Onlarca y\u0131ld\u0131r sanat tarih\u00e7ileri, Vincent van Gogh’a atfedilen bir\u00e7ok tablonun \u00f6zg\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hakk\u0131nda tart\u0131\u015f\u0131yor. 1990’lar\u0131n sonlar\u0131nda ve 2000’lerin ba\u015f\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcpheler artt\u0131 ve baz\u0131 uzmanlar b\u00fcy\u00fck m\u00fczelerdeki 45 van Gogh eserinin sahte olabilece\u011fini \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc. Ancak son zamanlarda kimlik do\u011frulama tekniklerindeki geli\u015fmeler bu e\u011filimde bir de\u011fi\u015fime yol a\u00e7t\u0131.<\/p>\n\n
Teknik analiz ve pigment tan\u0131mlama gibi y\u00fcksek teknolojili ara\u00e7lar, ara\u015ft\u0131rmac\u0131lar\u0131n daha \u00f6nce \u015f\u00fcpheli olan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 yeniden de\u011ferlendirmelerini sa\u011flad\u0131. Sonu\u00e7 olarak, bir zamanlar sahte olarak reddedilen “Montmajour’da G\u00fcn Bat\u0131m\u0131” ve “Ha\u015fha\u015fl\u0131 Vaz” gibi birka\u00e7 tablo do\u011fruland\u0131.<\/p>\n\n
Son geli\u015fmelerde, Stuart Pivar adl\u0131 tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 bir sanat koleksiyoncusu, Vincent van Gogh’a ait kay\u0131p bir eser olabilece\u011fine inand\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir manzara tablosu ortaya \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131. Tablo, sanat\u00e7\u0131n\u0131n son aylar\u0131n\u0131 ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi Fransa’n\u0131n Auvers kentindeki bu\u011fday tarlalar\u0131n\u0131 tasvir ediyor.<\/p>\n\n
Pivar, dava a\u00e7ma konusundaki do\u011fas\u0131 ve h\u00fck\u00fcm giymi\u015f cinsel su\u00e7lu Jeffrey Epstein ile olan ili\u015fkisiyle tan\u0131nan, sanat d\u00fcnyas\u0131nda kutupla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir fig\u00fcr. Buna ra\u011fmen tabloyu Paris d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir a\u00e7\u0131k art\u0131rmada yasal olarak edindi\u011fi konusunda \u0131srar ediyor.<\/p>\n\n
Duke \u00dcniversitesi Sanat M\u00fczesi’nin fahri m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc Michael Mezzatesta, tabloyu inceledi ve bozulmam\u0131\u015f durumuna ve Van Gogh’un ge\u00e7 d\u00f6nem teknikleriyle tutarl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na dikkat \u00e7ekti. Tuval kaba \u00e7uval bezi ve “Vincent” imzas\u0131, ka\u00e7ak ceviz kahverengi m\u00fcrekkeple “1890” tarihiyle birlikte ters tarafta g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcyor.<\/p>\n\n
Pivar, kimlik do\u011frulama i\u00e7in Amsterdam merkezli Van Gogh M\u00fczesi’ne ba\u015fvurdu. Pandemi nedeniyle kapal\u0131 olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen m\u00fcze, Pivar’\u0131n talebi i\u00e7in bir istisna yapt\u0131. E\u011fer do\u011frulan\u0131rsa, tablo Van Gogh’un eserleri aras\u0131ndaki en b\u00fcy\u00fck tablo ve kare bir tuval \u00fczerine yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f tek tablo olacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n
Tablonun etiketi, Amedeo Modigliani ve di\u011fer Montparnasse sanat\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 destekleyen \u00f6nemli bir koleksiyoncu olan Jonas Netter’e ait oldu\u011funu g\u00f6steriyor. Ancak tablonun tam men\u015fei gizemle \u00f6rt\u00fcl\u00fc kal\u0131yor ve Pivar, ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7ta tabloya sahip olanlara anonimlik s\u00f6z\u00fc veriyor.<\/p>\n\n
Tablonun do\u011frulu\u011fu kesin olmaktan \u00e7ok uzak. Van Gogh M\u00fczesi her y\u0131l \u00e7ok say\u0131da kimlik do\u011frulama talebi al\u0131yor ve bunlar\u0131n yaln\u0131zca k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir y\u00fczdesi daha fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma i\u00e7in hak ediyor. “Auvers, 1890″\u0131n \u015fansl\u0131 birka\u00e7 ki\u015fiden biri olup olmayaca\u011f\u0131 hen\u00fcz belli de\u011fil.<\/p>\n\n
E\u011fer do\u011frulan\u0131rsa, bu kay\u0131p manzara tablosunun ke\u015ffi sanat d\u00fcnyas\u0131nda \u00f6nemli bir olay olacakt\u0131r. Van Gogh’un bilinen eserlerini geni\u015fletecek ve son aylar\u0131na yeni bir \u0131\u015f\u0131k tutacakt\u0131r. Ancak Pivar’\u0131n dahil olmas\u0131yla ilgili tart\u0131\u015fmalar ve tablonun tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 k\u00f6kenlerinin \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki y\u0131llarda da tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 k\u00f6r\u00fcklemeye devam etmesi muhtemel.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Vincent van Gogh: Kay\u0131p Bir Manzara Tablosu Yeniden mi Bulundu? Orijinallik \u00dczerindeki Tart\u0131\u015fma Onlarca y\u0131ld\u0131r sanat tarih\u00e7ileri, Vincent van Gogh’a atfedilen bir\u00e7ok tablonun \u00f6zg\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hakk\u0131nda tart\u0131\u015f\u0131yor. 1990’lar\u0131n sonlar\u0131nda ve 2000’lerin…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":24245,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2947],"tags":[102,797,2944,104,8717],"class_list":["post-4851","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-painting","tag-lost-art","tag-authentication","tag-landscape-painting","tag-art-history","tag-van-gogh-rediscovered"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4851","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4851"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4851\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24246,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4851\/revisions\/24246"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/24245"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4851"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4851"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifescienceart.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4851"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}